Application of Demonstration Methods to Improve Learning Outcomes of Class X IPS Students of SMA Negeri 62 Central Maluku
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62966/joges.v1i3.326Keywords:
CAR, Demonstration, Method, LearningAbstract
This study aims to describe the application of the demonstration method, and the obstacles during the application of the demonstration method to improve student learning outcomes in class X IPS SMA Negeri 62 Central Maluku. This research is a type of classroom action research conducted in two cycles with four stages including planning, action, observation, and reflection. The research subjects were teachers and students of class X, totaling 35 students. Data collection techniques used in research are observation, tests, interviews, and field notes. The instruments used in this study were observation sheets, test sheets, interview sheets, and field note sheets. The results of observing teacher activity in cycle I was 2.6 increasing to 3.7% in cycle II. Then, the results of observing student activity in the first cycle were 67, 4 increased to 87.4 in cycle II. Data on the results of classical student learning completeness in cycle I showed that the percentage of students who completed learning was 59.4% and increased to 84.4% in cycle II. The obstacles encountered in cycle I and cycle II can be overcome properly. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that the application of the demonstration method in class X SMA 62 Maluku can improve student learning outcomes.
References
Chien, CW (2015). Pre-service English teachers' perceptions and practice of field experience and professional learning from expert teachers mentoring. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.953817
Ertmer, A.,P,& Newby, J., T. (2011). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(3), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143 43
Gonzalez, M., & Mohamad, GA (2022). Virtual literacy instruction: An investigation of how elementary educators exhibited TPACK during COVID-19 school closures. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(5), 54–88. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202216914
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, HM (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory of theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028044
Jalinus, N., Syahril, & Nabawi, RA (2019). A comparison of the problem-solving skills of students in pjBL versus CPjBL model: An experimental study. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.01.005
Janssen, M. (2019). Transient response of an electrolyte to a thermal quench. Physical Review E, 99(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.042136
Leptokaridou, E. , TVSP, & Papaioannou, & AG (2016). Experimental longitudinal test of the influence of autonomy-supportive teaching on motivation for participation in elementary school physical education. Educational Psychology, 36(7), 1135–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.950195
Schwichow, M., Croker, S., Zimmerman, C., Höffler, T., & Härtig, H. (2016). Teaching the control-of-variables strategy: A meta-analysis. In Developmental Review (Vol. 39, pp. 37–63). Mosby Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.12.001
Stigmar, M. (2016). Peer-to-peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963
Suandy, E. (2011). Tax Planning, 5th Edition. Salemba.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sri Ratna Sari, Ayatollah Muhammadin Al Fath
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
