Active and Creative Islamic Religious Education Learning Methods at SMP Muhammadiyah 57 Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62966/joges.v1i3.336Keywords:
active and creative, islamic religious, educationAbstract
The problem in this study will reveal the application of active and creative learning methods at Madrasah Aliyah Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Palengaan Pamekasan, this research aims to be able to describe the learning methods applied at SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 57 MEDAN. The type of data from observations is in the form of in-depth field notes and documentation in the form of archived notes. The research data source is the primary data source in the form of interviews and field observations with informants, while the secondary data source is in the form of document study results obtained in the research. The data collection procedure uses three data collection techniques, namely: participant observation techniques, in-depth interviews, and study of documents and using a qualitative descriptive method with primary data collection through interviews and observation while secondary data obtained through documentation. The research results show that the application of learning methods in Madrasahs is not yet effective because they still use conventional methods such as the lecture method, the discussion method, and the demonstration method. It is necessary to develop a variety of learning methods so that the learning process becomes active and creative.
References
Active and creative learning methods at madrasah diniyah takmiliyah in the city of Bogor. Islamic Education: Journal of Islamic Education, 9.
Afrizal, 2016. Qualitative Research Methods An Effort to Support the Use of Qualitative Research in Various Disciplines, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers).
Anwar, Qomar, 2005. Management of Islamic Education, (Jakarta; Gema Insani) Bogdan, RC, & Biklen, SK, 1998. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. (Third Edition. Boston: Ally and Bacon, Inc).
Burhanuddin and Esa Nur Wahyuni, 2007. Learning and Learning Theory. (Jogjakarta; Ar-Ruzz Media)
Hidayat, A., Sa'diyah, M., & Lisnawati, S. 2020.
Jauhar Muhammad, Implementation of Paikem from Behavioristic to Constructivistic Contextual Teaching & Learning.
M. Arifin, 2006. Islamic Education, Theoretical and Practical Reviews Based on an Interdisciplinary Approach, (Cet II, Jakarta; PT Bumi Aksara).
Majid Abdul and Jusuf Mudzakkir, 2006. Islamic Education, (Jakarta; Kencana) N. Ulfatin, 2013. Qualitative Research Methods in Education: Theories and Applications. (Malang: Banyumedia Publishing).
Prawironegoro Darsono, 2010. Educational Philosophy, (Jakarta; Nusantara Consulting) Qowaid et al. 2007. Islamic Education Learning Innovation (SMP). (Jakarta: Pena Citasatria.)
Rama Bahaking, 2011. Islamic Education A Basic Study, (Makassar; Alauddin University Press)
Rusman, 2011. Learning Models: Developing Teacher Professionalism (Cet. II; Jakarta: Raja gravido)
Sumiati and Asra, 2007. Learning Methods, (CV Wacana Prima; Bandung)
Sutrisno and Muhyidin Albarobis, 2012. Social Problem-Based Islamic Education, (Jogjakarta; Ar-Ruz Media)
Tafsir Ahmad, 2004. Horizon of Islamic Education Thought, (Bandung; Pulpit Library)
Yunus Mahmud, 2006. Education and Teaching, (Jakarta; Hidakarya Agung)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hamidah Nurul Badri Girsang, Siti Muti’ah, Husni Ayustia, Dinda Yusmeini, Nadiatul Ulya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.