Effectiveness of The Constructionist Approach on Economics Learning Achievement in Material Model Diagram Interaction of Economic Actors Class I
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62966/joges.v2i2.585Keywords:
Students can think critically, creatively, communicatively, honestly and responsibly.Abstract
Objective study This is 1) for know Performance Study student with Which No using a constructivism approach, 2) to determine students' learning achievements using PBL Model learning, 3) to find out what exists difference on performance Study between Which No use approach constructivism by using a constructivist approach to student economics material class I This research is a quantitative research with a post test only control design design. The place used for this research was SMP N 3 Muarasipongi One Roof . The research population was 15 students from class IX, using simple random sampling techniques. Data collection technique with written tests and documentation. Class I X as an experimental class. Technique analysis data Which used For analyze data in This research is an analysis t-test statistical data. Based on test score results. Student showing post-test average score the experimental class was 80.8 and the average post-test score for the control class was 67.6. For experimental class which means good, based on the analysis results it is known that the significance level is 5% for mark 68 (significant level of 5% or 1% for N = 70 and dk = 68, because dk = 68 does not listed in table distribution t so taken mark 60) Mark t table of et al = 60 is 2.02 And 5.756 which means t count > t table, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. So "there is a difference Which significant between approach constructivism And besides use approach constructivism on business economics learning achievement, material on the role of economic actors among students class.
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Procedure Study something Approach Practice. Jakarta:Rineka Create.
Dimyati and Mudjiono, Learning and Learning, (Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2006)
Surya, 2013. Problem Based Learning Model on Students' Creative Thinking Ability. Pages 871- 880. Vol.1. Number 1. Scientific Pen Journal. Kay in
Nafiah (2014, p. 126) According to Fathurrohman (2016, p. 119) Designing Innovative, Progressive and Contextual Learning Models (Concept and Implementation in the 2013 Curriculum) Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Daryanto and Rahardjo (2012, p. 162) Characteristics of Project Based Learning
Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2010). Study And Learning . Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Emzir. (2011). Qualitative Research Methodology Data Analysis. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Fathurrohman, Mohammed. (2015). Models Learning Innovative . Yogyakarta. Ar-ruzz Media.
Hamiyah, Nur & Mohammed Jauhar. (2014). Strategy And Learn how to teach in Class . Jakarta: Performance Library.
Huda, Miftahul. (2014). Teaching and Learning Models. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Assessment Guide for Elementary Schools (SD). Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). 2013 Curriculum Learning Models . Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Rusman (2012). Learning Strategy with Problem Based Learning. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Rusman. (2014). Models Learning . Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Homeland. Rusman. (2015). Learning Integrated Thematic: Theory, Practice and Assessment. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.
Slamet According to (2010:2) "Understanding Learning"
Slamet (2005). Big Indonesian Dictionary (3rd edition). Jakarta: Department of National Education Balai Pustaka. Class IX Teacher's Book and Student's Book , Theme 3 .3 : Characters and Discovery Book Integrated Thematic Independent Curriculum (Revision 2020). Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Salami

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.